Document control
Versions, approvals and distribution with read receipts.
Software for GMP+
Safety across the entire feed chain: raw materials, manufacturing, storage and transport, all under documented control.
GMP+ is the feed safety certification scheme run by GMP+ International. Its Feed Safety Assurance module combines a management system with HACCP applied to animal nutrition, supplier control, maximum levels of undesirable substances, traceability and monitoring plans. It applies across the whole chain: raw material production, feed manufacturing, trade, storage and transport.
Versions, approvals and distribution with read receipts.
Publish and version documents by connecting to OneDrive, Google Drive or SharePoint, without duplicating folders.
Annual program, checklists per standard, findings linked to actions.
Root cause, action, owner, deadline and effectiveness check.
Process objectives fed with real operating data.
A register of legal and other requirements, with validity and compliance evaluation per standard.
Root cause, action, owner, deadline and effectiveness check, all linked to the nonconformity.
Improvement opportunities with an owner and tracking, beyond just fixing what already failed.
A pre-built report with indicators, audits and nonconformities, ready for the meeting.
Feed-chain raw materials under control.
Periodic sampling with results linked to the batch.
Critical control points applied to feed manufacturing.
From raw material to delivered feed, batch by batch.
Requirements covered
Standards covered
Templates and records
Which clause of GMP+ calls for each record, which fields it needs, a completed example and what the auditor usually flags.
How to carry out the feed hazard analysis GMP+ requires: mycotoxins, dioxins, metals, Salmonella, carry-over…
How to purchase under GMP+: suppliers with a GMP+ or accepted equivalent certificate, gatekeeper protocols…
How to measure and control carry-over of additives and medicines between feed batches: measurement…
How to record previous loads and vehicle cleaning before loading feed under GMP+ B4 and the IDTF database…
How to build the GMP+ monitoring plan: which feed materials and feeds are tested, for which contaminants…
When and how to notify GMP+ International and customers of a feed safety problem under the EWS: data…
How to record feed batch traceability and test recall under GMP+: feed materials, batches, customers…
How to plan the GMP+ internal audit and verify feed HACCP: scope by B document, frequency, auditor, findings…
Frequently asked questions
The edition in force is GMP+ Feed Certification scheme (FSA module). When the issuing body publishes a new one, a transition period opens; once it closes, certificates issued against the previous edition stop being valid.
Yes. Your existing system — processes, documents, records, audit history — is loaded in and kept alive from day one. Nothing needs redesigning and the certification cycle does not restart.
Yes, provided they are traceable, controlled and able to show who did what and when. No standard requires paper; every standard requires reliable evidence, and a properly controlled electronic record provides it better than a folder.
Yes, and that is the sensible route. The common Annex SL structure lets a single integrated system share the process map, document control, internal audits, nonconformities and indicators between GMP+ and the rest, leaving only the standard-specific parts separate.
It depends on the starting point. An organisation already working with written procedures is usually ready in two or three months; one starting from scratch needs longer. The bottleneck is rarely the tool — it is the availability of the people who know the processes.
It is migrated. Existing procedures, forms and records are loaded with their version and approver, so the history is not lost and the system starts with the memory the organisation already had.
Yes. They are given read-only access with a defined scope and an expiry date. It is more comfortable for both sides than preparing a folder of screenshots and exports.
A major one compromises the system's ability to meet a requirement — a required process missing altogether, systematic failure, or a failure affecting the product — and usually blocks certification until it is closed. A minor one is a specific lapse resolved with an action plan.
Yes, from the data the processes themselves generate. That is the difference between a dashboard that reflects what is happening and a spreadsheet somebody fills in the week before the management review.
Yes. The model is multi-company and multi-site: what makes sense to share is shared, and what belongs to each location stays separate — including the certificate scope where it differs.
We'll show you the module running with data similar to yours.
Keep exploring
A free learning path on GMP+ FSA: the modules of the feed safety assurance scheme explained with practical…
Living HACCP, prerequisites with daily records, allergen control and traceability in minutes: one system for…
Analysis certificates, data sheets and declarations built from the real batch data, published on the…
Living documentation, planned audits, non-conformities with an owner, and indicators that calculate…
Kimobox is a software for GMP+ that digitizes the requirements of the standard: approval of raw material suppliers, haccp applied to feed manufacturing, batch traceability through to delivery, contaminant control and periodic sampling, with full traceability and evidence ready for the auditor.
The platform lets you run an integrated management system that combines GMP+ with other ISO standards and sector protocols, sharing the process map, document control, internal audits, non-conformities and KPIs.