Templates and records · ISO 27701 · Clause A.3
ISO 27701 personal data breach log template
Every personal data breach is documented, whether or not it is notified. The log is what proves it was assessed in time and that the decision was reasoned.
In one sentence
The personal data breach log documents every security breach affecting personal data, with its facts, its effects and the remedial action taken, and the reasoned decision on whether to notify the authority within 72 hours, because GDPR article 33(5) requires all of them to be documented and ISO/IEC 27701 builds their handling into the common controls of table A.3.
- Where the standard requires it
- ISO 27701 · Clause A.3 The 2025 edition is cited: numbers 4 to 10 are clauses; A.1, A.2 and A.3 are the Annex A tables with the controls for the controller, for the processor and common to both.
- Type of information
- Mandatory record A record to be retained (GDPR art. 33(5); incident management controls in table A.3)
- Who fills it in
- PIMS manager, with IT and the officer Whoever detects the breach reports it immediately through the established channel
- When
- From the first alert The 72-hour clock starts when the organisation becomes aware of the breach
- How long it is kept
- Set by the organisation Neither the standard nor the GDPR sets a period for the record itself; the storage limitation principle (GDPR art. 5(1)(e)) means whatever period is chosen has to be justified.
What the standard requires
What ISO 27701 demands and what it leaves to your judgement
The standard asks for security incidents to be managed with their privacy dimension in view: detecting whether they affect personal data, assessing the consequences for individuals and meeting notification obligations. The processor must inform its customer without undue delay (GDPR art. 33(2)).
The controller notifies the supervisory authority without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to rights and freedoms (art. 33(1)). If the risk is high, the data subjects are informed as well (art. 34).
Article 33(5) requires every breach to be documented —facts, effects and remedial action—, including those that are not notified. That documentation is what allows the authority to verify compliance.
Structure
Fields the template should include
- Reference number, date and time of detection and of awareness
- Description of what happened and type: confidentiality, integrity or availability
- Categories and approximate number of data subjects and records
- Likely consequences for individuals
- Measures taken and proposed to mitigate the effects
- Risk assessment and decision on notification, with the reason
- Date of notification to the authority and reference
- Communication to data subjects, where applicable
- Nonconformity or corrective action opened
Example
Example: an email sent with recipients visible at a fictitious training academy
Company, people and figures are fictitious: the example only shows what a properly completed record looks like.
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Reference and date | BR-2026-004 · 10 March 2026, 11:20 (awareness at 11:45) |
| Description | Email sent to 312 students with their addresses in the “To” field · Confidentiality |
| Data affected | Email addresses of 312 adult students |
| Consequences | Addresses exposed among students; no sensitive data |
| Measures | Apology asking recipients to delete the email; bulk mailings only from the newsletter platform |
| Decision | Not notified: unlikely to result in a risk to rights and freedoms · DPO’s reasoning on file |
| Action | NC-2026-011 opened to block sends to more than 20 recipients from personal mailboxes · Lumen Academy (fictitious) |
At the audit
Mistakes auditors commonly flag
- Only notified breaches are logged.
- The time of awareness is not recorded, so the deadline cannot be proved.
- The decision not to notify has no written reason.
- The processor contract does not set out how and when the processor must report.
- The breach is closed with no corrective action even though it exposed a control that was not working.
In Kimobox
How this record is kept in Kimobox
- 1Breaches are logged as incidents with their classification and the time of awareness.
- 2The system shows the time left before the 72 hours run out and alerts those responsible.
- 3The notification decision sits in the same record with its justification.
- 4A nonconformity is opened from the breach, with root cause mandatory.
Frequently asked questions
What people ask us before getting started
Do all breaches have to be notified?
No. Those likely to result in a risk to rights and freedoms are notified, but every one is documented (GDPR art. 33(5)).
What if the 72 hours are missed?
You notify anyway, explaining the reasons for the delay (art. 33(1)). The information can be provided in phases if it is not yet complete (art. 33(4)).
Keep your ISO 27701 records without loose templates
We'll show you the module running with data similar to yours.
Keep exploring
Related pages
Security breaches and data processors
The final block covers two critical obligations: notifying security breaches on time and controlling those…
Controls for controllers and processors
Annex A gathers the PIMS reference controls for controllers and processors; Annex B, also normative…
ISO 27701 record of processing activities template
What the record of processing activities must contain in an ISO 27701 PIMS and under GDPR article 30…
ISO 27701 personal data inventory template
How to build a personal data inventory for an ISO 27701 PIMS: where the data live, in which systems, who has…