Templates and records · ISO 22000 · Clause 8.3
ISO 22000 traceability and mock recall template
Pick a batch and rebuild, as quickly as possible, where its raw materials came from, how much was produced and who it was delivered to. Then check that the quantities add up.
In one sentence
The traceability and mock recall exercise tests the system by tracing a batch backwards and forwards, with its response time and the balance between raw materials and product, because ISO 22000 requires traceability (8.3) and the effectiveness of the withdrawal programme (8.9.5) to be verified and tested, and the evidence retained for at least the shelf life of the product.
- Where the standard requires it
- ISO 22000 · Clause 8.3 Clauses are cited using the numbering of ISO 22000:2018, the current edition. ISO is preparing a third edition that may renumber them; when it is published it will have its own transition period.
- Type of information
- Mandatory record Evidence of traceability (8.3) and withdrawal (8.9.5) to be retained
- Who fills it in
- Quality, with logistics and production The designated recall team should take part so that the exercise also tests the response
- When
- At the frequency the company sets At least once a year is usual; some customers ask for more
- How long it is kept
- At least the shelf life of the product It is the only period the standard sets (8.3). For long-life products that period governs; for fresh products it is worth extending it to the certification cycle.
What the standard requires
What ISO 22000 demands and what it leaves to your judgement
The traceability system must identify incoming material from suppliers and the first stage of distribution of the end product, taking into account the relationship between batches of raw materials, intermediate and end products, rework and distribution. The evidence is retained for at least the shelf life of the product, and the effectiveness of the system is verified and tested. The standard suggests, where appropriate, reconciling the quantities of end product with those of ingredients.
For withdrawal, top management appoints people with authority to initiate and carry it out, and arrangements are set for notifying interested parties, including the authorities, and for handling withdrawn product. Its effectiveness is verified, for example through mock recalls, and the outcome is retained.
The standard does not set the frequency or maximum time for the exercise; customers or certification schemes usually ask for them. In the European Union, Article 18 of Regulation (EC) 178/2002 requires one-step-back, one-step-forward traceability.
Structure
Fields the template should include
- Date, start time and scenario simulated
- Starting batch and direction: backward, forward or both
- Raw materials and supplier batches identified
- Production: intermediate batches, rework and quantity produced
- Dispatches: customers, dates and quantities
- Mass balance: inputs, outputs, stock and losses
- Total response time
- Communication test: customer and authority contacts checked
- Problems found and improvement actions
- Participants and signature
Example
Example: exercise on a batch of pumpkin soup
Company, people and figures are fictitious: the example only shows what a properly completed record looks like.
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Scenario | Notice from a supplier: possible presence of undeclared celery in a batch of vegetable stock |
| Starting batch | Vegetable stock, supplier batch CV-2602 · forward direction |
| Production | Used in pumpkin soup batches L26-064 and L26-065: 4,800 tubs |
| Dispatches | Three customers: 4,200 tubs; in own warehouse, 560 |
| Mass balance | 4,800 produced = 4,200 dispatched + 560 in stock + 40 samples and losses · reconciles |
| Time | 38 minutes from the notice to having the customer list |
| Communication | Emergency phone numbers for the three customers checked; one out of date |
| Improvement | Update emergency contacts on the customer record and review them every six months |
At the audit
Mistakes auditors commonly flag
- The exercise identifies customers but does not reconcile the quantities.
- An easy batch is always chosen, with no rework or shared raw materials.
- Only the paperwork is tested, not communication with customers and authorities.
- Traceability records are destroyed before the product's shelf life has expired.
- Problems found in the exercise do not lead to any actions.
In Kimobox
How this record is kept in Kimobox
- 1Raw material, production and dispatch batches are linked, and backward and forward queries are instant.
- 2The mock recall returns the list of affected batches and customers with its response time.
- 3Quality certificates and records hang off the batch and can be retrieved years later.
- 4If the ERP owns the batch, Kimobox consumes that data to attach the records to it.
Frequently asked questions
What people ask us before getting started
How often should an exercise be run?
ISO 22000 does not set a frequency: it asks you to test the effectiveness of the system. Once a year is usual, and many customers and private schemes require specific frequencies or times that are worth writing into the procedure.
What is a mass balance?
Comparing the quantity of raw material consumed with the quantity of product produced, dispatched, in stock and lost. If it does not reconcile, traceability has a gap even if it found the customers.
Keep your ISO 22000 records without loose templates
We'll show you the module running with data similar to yours.
Keep exploring
Related pages
GMP+ feed traceability and recall
How to record feed batch traceability and test recall under GMP+: feed materials, batches, customers…
Prerequisites, traceability and emergencies
The foundations of clause 8: prerequisites tailored to the sector, traceability that is put to the test and…
ISO 22000 prerequisite programmes (PRP) plan template
How to document ISO 22000 prerequisite programmes: selection, responsibilities, monitoring and verification…
ISO 22000 hazard analysis template
How to carry out the ISO 22000 hazard analysis: identification by step, acceptable level, significance…